Dear blogger, your headline may need a superhero

Batman delivering a punchline
Batman delivering a punchline (Photo credit: renophaston)

A room full of science bloggers fell silent after Liz Neeley ( asked how much effort they invested in headlines for their blog posts.

Apparently most of the public in the room, including myself, doesn’t fuss a lot about headlines. Seasoned blogger Brendan DeMelle ( told us that this inattention may cost your post a lot of its potential audience. Most viewers/readers will only read your headline. You have a few seconds of their attention, then they are gone, adios, sayonara, arrivederci. What you wanted to communicate is lost in the past. Can you say what you need to say in those 3 seconds? Can you hook your readers so they want to read more? To write great headlines is a difficult art to master, even with the help of A/B testing.

But, how can a superhero help you with a great headline? That is part of a story that started the day before Liz asked such a good question to the science bloggers audience:

It begins with a very cool post at the New York Times Bits blog. I don’t want to give away too many details. There is a video with scientist explaining their software and image analysis technique, and showing diverse examples of uses for it. One example shows video of a sleeping newborn. With the software you can make visible the small movement in the surface of the baby’s face due to blood circulation, and measure his pulse — without touching him. Another example shows that no special camera is needed; they take a clip from a movie with a famous actor sleeping on bed, just as shown in theaters, then the software shows his blood circulating up and down.

What was the headline of author Erik Olsen’s blog?

“Scientists Uncover Invisible Motion in Video”

Not a bad headline, but I read about the  Bits blog from another blog first, and that blog had added more information to the headline. Aatish Bhatia (Empirical Zeal) added a little more explanation when sharing the link to Eric Olsen’s piece:

“A pretty amazing algorithm magnifies imperceptible motions, allowing you to see the invisible”

Empirical zeal

I was so excited about the link shared by Aatish that I decided to share it too. Not to be outdone, I wrote my headline with even more words (a bad initial decision that ended with a bad headline).

“Image processing at its best. Tiny movements are exaggerated: you may measure the pulse of a person using a camera”

Nevertheless, I believed the headlines where interesting enough and the research was so fascinating that people would feel really compelled to read more. Click for the awesome video and hopefully stay and learn a little about image processing. I did not find how wrong I was until later, when I opened my twitter feed and I saw this post from Ed Yong:


Ed Yong grabbed the amazing headline crafted by Robert Krulwich on his blog Krulwich wonders “MIT Invents A Machine That Can Look At Batman’s Face And See His Heart Beating” then added a WOWOWOW! at the beginning (meaning look guys this is awesome) and gave you the exact part of the video where you can look at Batman’s face and see his heart beating. The picture is already showing you batman… If you can resist to click on the link it can only be that you have no pulse.

Lesson learned. Next time I write a headline I will remember Liz Neely’s question, and the treatment that Robert Krulwich and Ed Yong gave to this piece. In my opinion Batman kicked other headline’s but, and I will try to write more Batman headlines in the future.

6 thoughts on “Dear blogger, your headline may need a superhero”

  1. I am trying out a simplistic version of A/B testing. My blog software generates static files that are uploaded to S3 so I can’t do anything server-side. But, url parameters (stuff after a question mark in the address) are ignored. If I tweet a link to a post I can insert some extra ignored url parameters and gauge how well the text I used to introduce the post works using google analytics data. I figure that once someone has bothered to click on the tweet, they are already a little intrigued so I have a chance even if my blog title isn’t spectacular and the technique should help me figure out better titles in general.

    1. Hi RachaelL, Great idea! Do you use more than two different tweets for the same blog post? How far apart on time do you send them? I may do something similar but I do not want readers to feel I am sending them repeated tweets all the time. Any thoughts about how to avoid that? What do you use as a control? Something generic like “this is my latest blog post”?

  2. That was a great story about headlines AND new technologies in imaging. It looks as though the authors of the image enhancing software made their source code freely available for non-commercial purposes. I’m looking forward to trying it on a pet project I have in mind.

    1. Hi Eric
      The code is available since August 2012. The latest version gives the results you saw on the video. Let’s have coffee and talk about this pet project, hopefully does not have to do with feces this time 😉

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *